Search icon

Lincoln Construction LLC

Company Details

Name: Lincoln Construction LLC
Jurisdiction: Rhode Island
Entity type: Domestic Limited Liability Company
Status: Revoked Entity
Date of Organization in Rhode Island: 21 Jul 2016 (9 years ago)
Date of Dissolution: 30 Jul 2018 (7 years ago)
Date of Status Change: 30 Jul 2018 (7 years ago)
Identification Number: 001665252
ZIP code: 02860
County: Providence County
Principal Address: 504 SMITHFIELD AVENUE, PAWTUCKET, RI, 02860, USA

Agent

Name Role Address
LUIS RODRIGUES Agent 504 SMITHFIELD AVENUE, PAWTUCKET, RI, 02860, USA

MANAGER

Name Role Address
MARIA MENDES MANAGER 611 LONSDALE AVENUE CENTRAL FALLS, RI 02863 USA

Filings

Number Name File Date
201873532500 Revocation Certificate For Failure to File the Annual Report for the Year 2018-07-30
201865433600 Revocation Notice For Failure to File An Annual Report 2018-05-15
201602542800 Articles of Organization 2016-07-21

OSHA's Inspections within Industry

Inspection Nr Report ID Date Opened Site Address
339147704 0112300 2013-06-25 3311 EAST MAIN ROAD, PORTSMOUTH, RI, 02871
Inspection Type Referral
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2013-06-25
Emphasis L: FALL
Case Closed 2020-08-25

Related Activity

Type Referral
Activity Nr 826777
Safety Yes

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260503 A01
Issuance Date 2013-07-17
Abatement Due Date 2013-08-29
Current Penalty 3080.0
Initial Penalty 3080.0
Final Order 2013-08-09
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 3
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Establishment: On or about 06/25/2013 the employer did not provide a training program to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.
Citation ID 01002
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19261053 B01
Issuance Date 2013-07-17
Abatement Due Date 2013-07-19
Current Penalty 3080.0
Initial Penalty 3080.0
Final Order 2013-08-09
Nr Instances 2
Nr Exposed 2
Related Event Code (REC) Referral
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: Jobsite: On or about 06/25/2013 the RGC aluminum material hoist being used to access the overhang roof did not have the side rails extended (3) feet above the upper landing surface.
Citation ID 01003A
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19261053 B15
Issuance Date 2013-07-17
Abatement Due Date 2013-07-19
Current Penalty 3080.0
Initial Penalty 3080.0
Final Order 2013-08-09
Nr Instances 2
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(15): Ladders were not inspected by a competent person for visible defects on a periodic basis and after an occurrence that could affect their safe use: Jobsite: On or about 06/25/2013 the ladders used to access the roof sections were not inspected by a competent person for visible defects on a periodic basis in the following instances: (a) The Werner 40 foot extension ladder used to access the upper roof had multiple damaged rungs and the rope to the pulley system was not installed. (b) The Werner 32 foot extension ladder used to access the window eyebrow roof had multiple damaged rungs and the rope to the pulley system was not installed.
Citation ID 01003B
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19261053 B16
Issuance Date 2013-07-17
Abatement Due Date 2013-07-19
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2013-08-09
Nr Instances 2
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired: Jobsite: On or about 06/25/2013, the Werner extension ladders had structural defects to the rungs and ropes were not installed on the pulley systems whereby the ladders were not immediately marked in a manner identifying it as defective or tagged with "DO NOT USE" and immediately removed from service until repaired.
Citation ID 01003C
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19261060 A
Issuance Date 2013-07-17
Abatement Due Date 2013-08-08
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2013-08-09
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 3
Gravity 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards: Establishment: On or about 06/25/2013 the employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.
Citation ID 02001
Citaton Type Repeat
Standard Cited 19260501 B13
Issuance Date 2013-07-17
Abatement Due Date 2013-07-19
Current Penalty 6160.0
Initial Penalty 6160.0
Final Order 2013-08-09
Nr Instances 2
Nr Exposed 2
Related Event Code (REC) Referral
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Jobsite: On or about 06/25/2013 two employees were observed performing construction activities on the window eyebrow and overhang of a residential structure and were not protected by a guardrail system, net system, or personal fall protection exposing the employees to a fall of approximately 22 feet. The Lincoln Construction was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), which were contained in the following OSHA inspections: inspection number 314915646, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on 01/04/2011, with respect to a workplace located at 11 Dedford Street; in OSHA inspection number 314920877, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on 04/04/2012 with respect to a workplace located at 321 Plainfield Street, Providence, RI; and again in OSHA inspection number 555979, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order 09/04/2012 with respect to a workplace located at 131 Eustis Avenue, Newport, RI.
339145070 0112300 2013-06-24 3311 EAST MAIN ROAD, PORTSMOUTH, RI, 02871
Inspection Type Planned
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2013-06-24
Emphasis L: FALL, P: FALL
Case Closed 2013-06-27
338975964 0112300 2013-03-25 41 MEMORIAL BLVD., NEWPORT, RI, 02840
Inspection Type Planned
Scope Complete
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2013-03-25
Emphasis L: FALL, P: FALL
Case Closed 2019-03-28

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260501 B13
Issuance Date 2013-04-30
Current Penalty 2520.0
Initial Penalty 2520.0
Final Order 2013-08-07
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. Worksite: Fall protection was not used by employees working on the roof of a residential home.
335559795 0112300 2012-07-19 131 EUSTIS AVE., NEWPORT, RI, 02841
Inspection Type Planned
Scope Complete
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2012-07-19
Emphasis L: FALL
Case Closed 2015-06-12

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260501 B13
Issuance Date 2012-08-13
Current Penalty 1540.0
Initial Penalty 3080.0
Final Order 2012-09-04
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 4
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. Worksite: Employees were not using fall protection while working on the roof of a residential home.
314920877 0112300 2012-01-26 321 PLAINFIELD ST., PROVIDENCE, RI, 02904
Inspection Type Complaint
Scope Complete
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2012-01-26
Emphasis S: FALL FROM HEIGHT, S: RESIDENTIAL CONSTR, L: FALL
Case Closed 2014-05-05

Related Activity

Type Complaint
Activity Nr 208577924
Safety Yes

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260501 B13
Issuance Date 2012-02-06
Abatement Due Date 2012-02-09
Current Penalty 4000.0
Initial Penalty 8400.0
Final Order 2014-05-13
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 4
Related Event Code (REC) Complaint
Gravity 10
314915646 0112300 2010-12-14 11 DEDFORD ST, EAST GREENWICH, RI, 02818
Inspection Type Complaint
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2010-12-14
Emphasis L: FALL, L: RESCON, S: RESIDENTIAL CONSTR, S: FALL FROM HEIGHT
Case Closed 2013-11-05

Related Activity

Type Complaint
Activity Nr 208004853
Safety Yes

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260501 B13
Issuance Date 2010-12-28
Abatement Due Date 2011-01-07
Current Penalty 3780.0
Initial Penalty 3780.0
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
Related Event Code (REC) Complaint
Gravity 10

Date of last update: 26 Oct 2024

Sources: Rhode Island Department of State