| Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2018-04-09
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2019-09-30
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Complaint |
| Activity Nr |
1325675 |
| Safety |
Yes |
| Health |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 B04 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-04-24 |
| Current Penalty |
2495.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2495.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-06-04 |
| Nr Instances |
4 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(4): Each end of a platform, not cleated or otherwise restrained by hooks or equivalent means, did not extend over the centerline of its support at least 6 inches (15 cm): (a) Worksite: On or about 4/9/2018, employees worked from a scaffold platform, where the planks did not extend at least six inches beyond the scaffold frame support. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 E09 IV |
| Issuance Date |
2018-04-24 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-06-04 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(9)(iv): Cross braces on tubular welded frame scaffolds were used as a means of access or egress: (a) Worksite: On or about 4/9/2018, the employer did not prevent employees from using cross bracing and other scaffold components to climb and gain access to and from a scaffold system. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001C |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 F04 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-04-24 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-05-17 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-06-04 |
| Nr Instances |
27 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(4): Part(s) of a scaffold that were damaged or weakened, such that the scaffold's strength was less than that required by paragraph (a) of this section, were not immediately repaired, replaced, braced to meet those provisions, nor removed from service until repaired: (a) Worksite: On or about 4/9/2018, the employer did not take split and rotted scaffold planks that were installed and being used as part of the scaffold system, out of service. The employer also did not use solid wood scaffold grade planks. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001D |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260452 C02 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-04-24 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-06-04 |
| Nr Instances |
8 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.452(c)(2): Tubular welded frames and panels were not braced by cross, horizontal, or diagonal braces, or combination thereof, which would have secured vertical members together laterally: (a) Worksite: On or about 4/9/2018, the employer did not ensure that all scaffold cross-bracing was installed to support the framework and the intended load. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19261153 G01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-04-24 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-06-08 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-06-04 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written silica exposure control plan: (a) Worksite: On or about 4/9/2018, the employer had not developed and implemented a written exposure control plan regarding work activities such as cutting brick or concrete block and mixing cement, where employees could be exposed to silica dust. |
|
|
