| Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Health
|
| Close Conference |
2019-05-29
|
| Emphasis |
L: EISAX50, L: EISAOF, N: LEAD
|
| Case Closed |
2019-12-31
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Complaint |
| Activity Nr |
1458164 |
| Safety |
Yes |
| Health |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2019-11-26 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2019-12-30 |
| Current Penalty |
7577.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
7577.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-12-23 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
20 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: Jobsite: On or about May 29, 2019 employees were issued and used N-95 filtering facepiece respirators, 3M half mask respirators, and MSA full face mask respirators without medical evaluations. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 F01 |
| Issuance Date |
2019-11-26 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2019-12-30 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-12-23 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
20 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: Jobsite: On or about May 29, 2019 employees were issued and used N-95 filtering facepiece respirators, 3M half mask respirators, and MSA full face mask respirators without being fit tested. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101018 E02 |
| Issuance Date |
2019-11-26 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2019-12-30 |
| Current Penalty |
947.5 |
| Initial Penalty |
9472.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-12-23 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
20 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1018(e)(2): Initial monitoring was not performed for each workplace, or work operation covered by 29 CFR 1910.1018 to accurately determine the airborne concentration of inorganic arsenic to which employees may be exposed: Jobsite: On or about May 29, 2019 the employer did not perform initial monitoring to determine the airborne concentration of inorganic arsenic to which employees were exposed. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101025 D02 |
| Issuance Date |
2019-11-26 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2019-12-30 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-12-23 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
20 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(2): An initial determination was not made to determine if any employee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level: Jobsite: On or about May 29, 2019 the employer did not perform initial monitoring to determine if any employee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002C |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101027 D01 I |
| Issuance Date |
2019-11-26 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2019-12-30 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-12-23 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
20 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1027(d)(1)(i): The employer did not determine whether any employee was exposed to cadmium at or above the action level: Jobsite: On or about May 29, 2019 the employer did not perform initial monitoring to determine whether any employee was exposed to cadmium at or above the action level. |
|
|
