343991212
|
0112300
|
2019-05-08
|
200 ESTEN AVENUE, PAWTUCKET, RI, 02860
|
|
Inspection Type |
Referral
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Health
|
Close Conference |
2019-05-08
|
Emphasis |
L: EISAOF
|
Case Closed |
2019-10-16
|
Related Activity
Type |
Referral |
Activity Nr |
1453167 |
Health |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001A |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19261153 C01 |
Issuance Date |
2019-08-06 |
Abatement Due Date |
2019-09-20 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
4376.0 |
Final Order |
2019-08-21 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
4 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section: (a) Worksite: Employees using handheld grinders to conduct tuck pointing (repointing) activities on the exterior of a brick and mortar building were not utilizing the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task. |
|
Citation ID |
01001B |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19261153 D02 I |
Issuance Date |
2019-08-06 |
Abatement Due Date |
2019-09-20 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2019-08-21 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
4 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section: (a) Worksite: When employees conducted tuck pointing (re-pointing) activities, the employer did not perform initial monitoring to assess if the employees' exposure to respirable silica-containing dusts met, or exceeded, OSHA's Action Level. |
|
|
343466538
|
0112300
|
2018-09-17
|
200 ESTEN AVENUE, PAWTUCKET, RI, 02860
|
|
Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Safety
|
Close Conference |
2018-09-17
|
Emphasis |
L: EISAOF, L: EISAX50, L: FALL
|
Case Closed |
2018-12-13
|
Related Activity
Type |
Complaint |
Activity Nr |
1381963 |
Safety |
Yes |
Health |
Yes |
|
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1346643 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100134 E01 |
Issuance Date |
2018-10-01 |
Abatement Due Date |
2018-11-16 |
Current Penalty |
1489.0 |
Initial Penalty |
2356.0 |
Final Order |
2018-10-24 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (Construction Reference 1926.103): (a) Worksite: On or about 9/17/2018, the employer did not ensure that employees, who are required to wear respirators, were medically evaluated and qualified to use a respirator before actually doing so. |
|
Citation ID |
01001B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100134 K01 |
Issuance Date |
2018-10-01 |
Abatement Due Date |
2018-11-16 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2018-10-24 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide respirator training that ensured that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of at least the following elements: Why the respirator is necessary and how improper fit, usage, or maintenance can compromise the protective effect of the respirator; What the limitations and capabilities of the respirator are; How to use the respirator effectively in emergency situations, including situations in which the respirator malfunctions; How to inspect, put on and remove, use, and check the seals of the respirator; What the procedures are for maintenance and storage of the respirator, and How to recognize medical signs and symptoms that may limit or prevent the effective use of respirators: (a) Worksite: On or about 9/17/2018, the employer did not ensure that employees were properly trained in the use and care of tight-fitting respirators, for which they are required to use. |
|
Citation ID |
02001 |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19100134 F02 |
Issuance Date |
2018-10-01 |
Abatement Due Date |
2018-11-16 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
311.0 |
Final Order |
2018-10-24 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employees using tight-fitting face-piece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: (Construction Reference 1926.103). (a) Worksite: On or about 9/17/2018, the employer did not ensure that employees received a respirator fit test before being required to using them. |
|
Citation ID |
02002 |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19261153 G01 |
Issuance Date |
2018-10-01 |
Abatement Due Date |
2018-11-16 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
311.0 |
Final Order |
2018-10-24 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written silica exposure control plan: (a) Worksite: On or about 9/17/2018, the employer had not developed a written exposure control plan to protect employees from silica dust while re-pointing a multi-story brick building. |
|
|
307575647
|
0112300
|
2005-11-01
|
HARTFORD AVE., JOHNSTON, RI, 02919
|
|
Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Safety
|
Close Conference |
2005-11-01
|
Case Closed |
2005-11-09
|
Related Activity
Type |
Complaint |
Activity Nr |
205436439 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
|
122517675
|
0112300
|
1995-05-30
|
1400 BALD HILL ROAD, WARWICK, RI, 02886
|
|
Inspection Type |
Referral
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Safety
|
Close Conference |
1995-05-30
|
Case Closed |
1996-06-17
|
Related Activity
Type |
Referral |
Activity Nr |
902602457 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260020 B01 |
Issuance Date |
1995-07-10 |
Abatement Due Date |
1995-09-24 |
Current Penalty |
150.0 |
Initial Penalty |
750.0 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
10 |
Gravity |
03 |
|
Citation ID |
01001B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260021 B02 |
Issuance Date |
1995-07-10 |
Abatement Due Date |
1995-09-24 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
10 |
Gravity |
00 |
|
Citation ID |
01002A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260451 A03 |
Issuance Date |
1995-07-10 |
Abatement Due Date |
1995-07-14 |
Current Penalty |
300.0 |
Initial Penalty |
1500.0 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
10 |
Gravity |
10 |
|
Citation ID |
01002B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260451 A13 |
Issuance Date |
1995-07-10 |
Abatement Due Date |
1995-07-14 |
Nr Instances |
2 |
Nr Exposed |
4 |
Gravity |
00 |
|
Citation ID |
01002C |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260451 A14 |
Issuance Date |
1995-07-10 |
Abatement Due Date |
1995-07-14 |
Nr Instances |
2 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
Gravity |
00 |
|
Citation ID |
02001 |
Citaton Type |
Willful |
Standard Cited |
19260451 D10 |
Issuance Date |
1995-07-10 |
Abatement Due Date |
1995-07-14 |
Current Penalty |
3500.0 |
Initial Penalty |
7000.0 |
Nr Instances |
4 |
Nr Exposed |
4 |
Gravity |
10 |
|
|