Citation ID |
01001A |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19100107 C02 |
Issuance Date |
2016-04-14 |
Current Penalty |
750.0 |
Initial Penalty |
3500.0 |
Final Order |
2016-05-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(2): Open flame(s) or spark producing equipment were located in the spraying area(s): a) Spray Painting Room : On or about 10-20-15 steel hand tools were stored and used inside of the enclosed spray painting room within 10 feet of the entrance to the spray booth. |
|
Citation ID |
01001B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100107 C09 I |
Issuance Date |
2016-04-14 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2016-05-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(9)(i): All metal parts of piping systems conveying flammable or combustible liquids were not properly electrically grounded in an effective and permanent manner: a) Spray Painting Room: On or about 10-20-15 the aluminum spray gun used to apply flammable lacquer solvents was not effectively grounded. |
|
Citation ID |
01001C |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19100107 E09 |
Issuance Date |
2016-04-14 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2016-05-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.107(e)(9): Flammable liquids for use in spraying operations were transferred from one container to another without both containers being effectively bonded and grounded to prevent discharge sparks of static electricity: a) Paint Storage Room: On or about 10-20-15 the steel container used to store waste flammable lacquer thinner was not effectively bonded and grounded. |
|
Citation ID |
01002A |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19100107 F03 |
Issuance Date |
2016-04-14 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-06-17 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
3500.0 |
Final Order |
2016-05-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
14 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.107(f)(3): Sprinklers protecting spraying areas were not kept as free from deposits as practical by cleaning daily if necessary: a) Spray Painting Room: On or about 10-20-15 sprinkler heads located in the ceiling of the spray booth were not kept free of deposits as practical. |
|
Citation ID |
01002B |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19100107 G02 |
Issuance Date |
2016-04-14 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-06-17 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2016-05-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
14 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(2): All spraying areas were not kept as free from the accumulation of deposits of combustible residues as practical, with cleaning conducted daily if necessary: a) Spray Painting Room: On or about 10-20-15 spraying areas were not kept as free from accumulations of deposits of combustible residues as practical. |
|
Citation ID |
01003A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100134 C01 |
Issuance Date |
2016-04-14 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-07-18 |
Current Penalty |
1750.0 |
Initial Penalty |
3500.0 |
Final Order |
2016-05-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
14 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a) Workplace: On or about 10-20-15 the employer did not maintain a written respiratory protection program that included the provisions of 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures. |
|
Citation ID |
01003B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100134 D01 III |
Issuance Date |
2016-04-14 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-07-18 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2016-05-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
14 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form: a) Assembly: On or about 12-22-15 the employer did not identify and evaluate employee exposures to respiratory hazards, including John C Dolph Co.'s "Dolphon 1095", a 2-part epoxy paint, in the workplace. b) Spray Painting Area: On or about 10-20-15 the employer did not identify and evaluate employee exposures to respiratory hazards, including Providence Lacquer's Fram Orange RTU Gloss Metal Lacquer "PLX-2108RTU1", in the workplace. |
|
Citation ID |
01003C |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100134 F02 |
Issuance Date |
2016-04-14 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-07-18 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2016-05-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
14 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: a) Spray Painting Area: On or about 10-20-15 the employer did not provide for fit testing of the half mask respirator provided to an employee as protection against respiratory hazards associated with spray painting. |
|
Citation ID |
01003D |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100134 K01 I |
Issuance Date |
2016-04-14 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-07-18 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2016-05-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
14 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of why the respirator was necessary and how improper fit, usage, or maintenance could compromise the protective effect of the respirator: a) Assembly Area: On or about 12-22-15 employees did not demonstrate the proper use of respirators to provide adequate protection. b) Spray Painting Area: On or about 10-20-15 employees did not demonstrate the proper use and maintenance of respirators to provide adequate protection. |
|
Citation ID |
01004 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100134 E01 |
Issuance Date |
2016-04-14 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-07-18 |
Current Penalty |
1750.0 |
Initial Penalty |
3500.0 |
Final Order |
2016-05-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
14 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) Assembly Area: On or about 12-22-15 the employer did not provide a medical evaluation before providing employees with half mask elastomeric respirators for use in the workplace. b) Spray Painting Area: On or about 10-20-15 the employer did not provide a medical evaluation before providing employees with half mask elastomeric respirators for use in the workplace. |
|
Citation ID |
01005A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 C01 |
Issuance Date |
2016-04-14 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-05-18 |
Current Penalty |
1750.0 |
Initial Penalty |
3500.0 |
Final Order |
2016-05-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(c)(1): Employee(s) were exposed to lead at concentrations greater than fifty micrograms per cubic meter of air averaged over an eight-hour period: a) Spray Painting Room: An employee was exposed to airborne lead in excess of the eight hour time weighted average permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50.0 micrograms per cubic meter; 1) On or about 12-22-15 an employee engaged in spray painting was monitored for airborne inorganic lead for 297 minutes. This employee was exposed to 279 micrograms per cubic meter, which is over the PEL. A zero exposure level was considered for the remaining 183 minutes of the eight hour work day. |
|
Citation ID |
01005B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 D02 |
Issuance Date |
2016-04-14 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-05-18 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2016-05-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(2): An initial determination was not made to determine if any employee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level: a) Workplace: On or about 10-20-15 an initial determination was not made to determine if employees were exposed to lead at or above the action level. |
|
Citation ID |
01005C |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 E01 I |
Issuance Date |
2016-04-14 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-05-18 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2016-05-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(1)(i): For any employees exposed to lead above the permissible exposure limit for more than 30 days per year where engineering and work practice controls (including administrative controls) were feasible but did not reduce the employees' exposure to or below the permissible exposure limit the employer did not use engineering and/or work practice controls to reduce exposures to the lowest feasible level: a) Spray Painting Room: On or about 10-20-15 the employer did not ensure that engineering and work practice controls (spray paint booth) were in use to reduce exposures to the lowest feasible level. |
|
Citation ID |
01005D |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 G01 |
Issuance Date |
2016-04-14 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-05-18 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2016-05-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(g)(1): Appropriate protective work clothing and equipment was not provided when employee(s) were exposed to lead above the permissible exposure limit (PEL), without regard to the use of respirators, or where the possibility of skin or eye irritation exists: a) Paint Spraying Room: On or about 10-20-15 employees were not provided with appropriate protective work clothing. |
|
Citation ID |
01005E |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 H01 |
Issuance Date |
2016-04-14 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-06-17 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2016-05-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1): All surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead: a) On or about 12-22-15 the following work surfaces were contaminated: 1) Spray Painting Room: The shelf used to store nitrile gloves was contaminated with 904 ug/ft2 of lead, 2) Paint Storage Room: The table used to maintain painting equipment was contaminated with 395 ug/ft2 of lead, 3) Shipping Lower Level Work Station: The table used to package finished product was contaminated with 1366 ug/ft2 of lead, 4) Shipping Upper Level Work Station: The table used to package finished product was contaminated with 603 ug/ft2 of lead. |
|
Citation ID |
01006A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 J01 I |
Issuance Date |
2016-04-14 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-05-18 |
Current Penalty |
1750.0 |
Initial Penalty |
3500.0 |
Final Order |
2016-05-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(j)(1)(i): The employer did not institute a medical surveillance program for all employees who are or may be exposed at or above the action level for more than 30 days per year: a) Paint Spraying Operation: On or about 10-20-15 the employer had not instituted a medical surveillance program for all employees who are or may be exposed at or above the action level for more than 30 days per year. |
|
Citation ID |
01006B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101026 K01 I A |
Issuance Date |
2016-04-14 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-05-18 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2016-05-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1026(k)(1)(i)(A): The employer did not make medical surveillance available for all employees who were or could be occupationally exposed to chromium (VI) at or above the action level for 30 or more days a year: a) Paint Spraying Operation: On or about 10-20-15 the employer did not make medical surveillance available for all employees who were or could be occupationally exposed to chromium (VI) at or above the action level for 30 or more days a year. |
|
Citation ID |
01007A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 L01 I |
Issuance Date |
2016-04-14 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-05-18 |
Current Penalty |
1750.0 |
Initial Penalty |
3500.0 |
Final Order |
2016-05-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
14 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(l)(1)(i): Employee(s) working in an area where there is potential exposure to airborne lead at any level were not informed of the content of Appendices A and B of 29 CFR 1910.1025: a) Workplace: On or about 10-20-15 the employer had not informed employees working in an area where there is potential exposure to airborne lead at any level of the content of Appendices A and B of 29 CFR 1910.1025. |
|
Citation ID |
01007B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 M02 I |
Issuance Date |
2016-04-14 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-05-18 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2016-05-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
80 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(m)(2)(i): The employer did not post the following warning signs in each work area where the PEL is exceeded: DANGER LEAD MAY DAMAGE FERTILITY OR THE UNBORN CHILD CAUSES DAMAGE TO THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DO NOT EAT, DRINK OR SMOKE IN THIS AREA a) Spray Painting Operations: On or about 10-20-15 warning signs were not posted in each work area where the permissible exposure limit (PEL) was exceeded. |
|
Citation ID |
01008A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101026 C |
Issuance Date |
2016-04-14 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-05-18 |
Current Penalty |
1750.0 |
Initial Penalty |
3500.0 |
Final Order |
2016-05-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1026(c): Employees were exposed to an airborne concentration of chromium (VI) which exceeded 5 micrograms per cubic meter of air, as an 8-hour time-weighted average: a) Spray Painting Room: An employee was exposed to airborne concentrations of chromium (VI) in excess of the eight hour time weighted average permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 5.0 micrograms per cubic meter; 1) On or about 12-22-15 an employee engaged in spray painting was monitored for chromium (VI) for 433 minutes. This employee was exposed to 37.0 micrograms per cubic meter, which is over the PEL. A zero exposure level was considered for the remaining 47 minutes of the eight hour work day. |
|
Citation ID |
01008B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101026 D01 |
Issuance Date |
2016-04-14 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-05-18 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2016-05-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1): The employer with a workplace or work operation covered by this standard did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI): a) Workplace: On or about 10-20-15 the employer with a workplace or work operation covered by this standard did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI). |
|
Citation ID |
01008C |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101026 E01 |
Issuance Date |
2016-04-14 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-05-18 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2016-05-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
80 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1026(e)(1): The employer did not establish a regulated area wherever an employee's exposure to airborne concentrations of chromium (VI) was, or could reasonably be expected to be, in excess of the permissible exposure limit: (a) Spray Painting Operations: On or about 10-20-15 the employer did not establish a regulated area wherever an employee's exposure to airborne concentrations of chromium (VI) was, or could reasonably be expected to be, in excess of the permissible exposure limit. |
|
Citation ID |
01008D |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101026 F01 I |
Issuance Date |
2016-04-14 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-05-18 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2016-05-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1026(f)(1)(i): Feasible engineering controls and work practices were not instituted to reduce and maintain employee exposures to chromium (VI) at or below the permissible exposure limit: a) Spray Painting Room: On or about 10-20-15 the employer did not ensure that feasible engineering controls and work practices were instituted to reduce and maintain employee exposures to chromium (VI) at or below the permissible exposure limit |
|
Citation ID |
01008E |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101026 H01 |
Issuance Date |
2016-04-14 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-05-18 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2016-05-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1026(h)(1): A hazard was present or was likely to be present from skin or eye contact with chromium (VI); however, the employer did not provide appropriate personal protective clothing and equipment at no cost to employees, and/or did not ensure that employees used such clothing and equipment: a) Paint Spraying Room: On or about 10-20-15 employees were not provided with appropriate protective work clothing. |
|
Citation ID |
01008F |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101026 J01 I |
Issuance Date |
2016-04-14 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-05-18 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2016-05-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1026(j)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that all surfaces were maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of chromium (VI): a) On or about 12-22-15 the following work surfaces were contaminated: 1) Spray Painting Room: The shelf used to store nitrile gloves was contaminated with 2.47ug/100cm2 of chromium (IV), 2) Paint Storage Room: The table used to maintain painting equipment was contaminated with 2.14ug/100cm2 of chromium (IV), 3) Shipping Lower Level Work Station: The table used to package finished product was contaminated with 11.3ug/100cm2 of chromium (IV). |
|
Citation ID |
01008G |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101026 L01 III |
Issuance Date |
2016-04-14 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-05-18 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2016-05-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
14 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(1)(iii): The employer had not included chromium (VI) in the hazard communication program, established to comply with the Hazard Communication Standard, 29 CFR 1910.1200, ensured that each employee had access to labels on containers of chromium (VI) and to safety data sheets, and was trained in accordance with the requirements of the Hazard Communication Standard and 29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(2), including the contents of the Hexavalent Chromium Standard, the purpose and a description of the medical surveillance program, and made copies of this standard available to all affected employees: a) Workplace: On or about 10-20-15 the employer had not included chromium (VI) in the hazard communication program. |
|
Citation ID |
01009A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101200 E01 |
Issuance Date |
2016-04-14 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-07-18 |
Current Penalty |
1750.0 |
Initial Penalty |
3500.0 |
Final Order |
2016-05-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
80 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a) Workplace: On or about 10-20-15 the employer did not develop and maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how all of the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met. |
|
Citation ID |
01009B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101200 H01 |
Issuance Date |
2016-04-14 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-07-18 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2016-05-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
80 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a) Workplace: On or about 10-20-15 the employer had not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area. |
|